Donald Trump: An American in Name Only, Part 2
By now it should be overwhelmingly clear that Donald isn’t exactly a gifted reasoner. His meandering thoughts and nonsensical arguments — if one can even give his ramblings that label — show a man incapable of basic rationality who largely bases his points of view off a world that doesn’t at all resemble reality.
In doing so, and given his voice’s volume, refusal to backtrack on his obvious lies, and now his position as president, Donald Trump parlays his shortcomings into those of the nation. Whenever someone commands 46 percent of the vote and a base so rabid it ignores all words that don’t fawn in favor over their hero, that person has a frightening ability to shape the thoughts of others and to fundamentally change what a broad swath of the population believes.
Donald is doing just that.
“But her emails” has become a popular joke on the left precisely because it’s seemingly all Trump supporters and voters know how to rebut an argument. Trump led them to believe that Hillary Clinton’s emails somehow showed a nefarious character secretly working to undermine American greatness by putting service members lives at risk, allowing foreign powers easy access to classified information, and exposing a woman, paradoxically, both so incompetent and yet so conniving and plotting as to have a private server.
Never mind that the Clinton email case never deserved the attention it received.
Never mind that Vice President Mike Pence used a personal email for work during his tenure as Indiana’s governor.
Never mind that Trump himself blurted out highly classified information to a foreign adversary simply to brag about all he’s told.
It doesn’t matter because Clinton had a personal email server and deleted 33,000 emails. (Of course, they don’t realize she deleted personal emails. That takes thought to understand.)
This is called “whataboutism,” a propaganda technique used to point out another side’s shortcomings, often when unable to defend your own point of view. It perfectly describes how Trump and his supporters rationalize their beliefs. Rather than defend Trump or his policies on their own terms, lawmakers and supporters simply say “well, what about [x]?”
(Interestingly, conservative outlets have already risen to the defense of whataboutism, a further example of the intellectual dishonesty and atrophy in the Trump-supporting right.)
We see this throughout the “healthcare” debate: No supporter of Trumpcare bothers to defend the policy on its merits; they instead say “what about Obamacare? It’s completely failed.”
Trump himself frequently resorts to whataboutism on his Twitter account, ignoring and failing defend his shortcomings but saying “what about her emails?” or “what about Clinton receiving a debate question?” or “what about Obama?”
Those are neither arguments nor reason to support a politician and his policies. But when actions, beliefs, and the president are so indefensible, it becomes natural to simply abandon reason and instead cling to Soviet propaganda techniques that arise only from being on the wrong side of history.
Trump’s campaign speeches — and even his “American carnage” inaugural address — painted a dying America beset by crime, riddled with terrorism, and at risk of losing its sovereignty to…someone, or something. These speeches managed to convince supporters that the United States was burning and that we needed a strongman — even, perhaps, a slight authoritarian — to crackdown on those destroying this country in order to revive civility and American greatness.
The world Trump described and which his supporters began to see does not exist.
His speeches of imminent doom find no support in the reality of American life yet by continuing to push demonstrably false outlooks, Trump’s creating an alternate world in which he and his supporters live. He then crafts — and his voters adamantly support — disastrous policies designed for another world, policies that are disastrous for our reality.
Take the murder rate. Trump constantly says murder is at a 40 year high. That’s simply not true.
Or illegal immigrants, who Trump, in his very first speech as a candidate, labelled as “rapists” and “criminals.” But that’s also not true.
The reason for that should be clear: Always at risk of deportation, committing a crime would make such an action a near certainty.
Similarly, Trump and his supporters view sanctuary cities as liberal hellholes devoted to protecting illegal immigrant criminals.
In reality, sanctuary cities encourage undocumented immigrants to turn to local law enforcement without fear of deportation. That makes communities safer.
Or take terrorism. Trump sees an America at constant threat of being attacked by “radical Islamic terrorists” and wants to ban all Muslims from entering the country. His most deplorable supporters simply want to ban Islam, no questions asked, and either deport or kill the Muslims living in America.
But terrorism hardly qualifies as a threat. You’re more likely to die from furniture than you from a terrorist.
But that doesn’t stop Trump and his supporters from irrationally fearing 1.6 billion people, a feat of which people are capable only if they live in an alternate world.
Trump’s delusions and his supporters’ susceptibility to the rhetorical appeals of a demagogue leave all too many voters and American citizens ignoring reason and reality. The dangers for democracy and our country cannot be overstated.
Politicians and voters no longer try to defend candidate or policy merits. Instead, they point to a bogeyman and scream “WHAT ABOUT HER?!?!” This requires no reason and no understanding of the issues at hand. It leaves people vulnerable to irrational fears and biases that lead to unenlightened and wholly irrational decision making.
Similarly, creating and supporting policy based on lies endangers us all. It forsakes addressing real problems with addressing non-existent ones contrived by a power-seeking candidate and which often wrongly vilify or target minority populations (scapegoats for the nation’s problems). Policy comes from hate and fear rather than a desire to better our current reality.
And so we must resist these types of appeals. We must truly rationalize our support for a candidate or policy with real arguments. We must reach out to those caught up in a cult-like faction and try to return them and their thoughts to reality.
We must end this senseless and disastrous war on reason and reality.